<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Situational Adoption Curve</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/</link>
	<description>"Predicting the future is easy. It's trying to figure out what's going on now that's hard" (Dressler, 2005)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 12:15:05 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Britt</title>
		<link>http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/comment-page-1/#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Britt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 13:04:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/#comment-71</guid>
		<description>Scott - Interesting comment ... and with my military career, I definitely see where you are coming from.  There is no doubt that, when it comes to social bookmarking, blogging, and twitter, my colleagues and I are in the early adopter arena (back edge maybe, but still early adopters).  Need to reflect some on getting late adopters and laggards to the S1 stage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott &#8211; Interesting comment &#8230; and with my military career, I definitely see where you are coming from.  There is no doubt that, when it comes to social bookmarking, blogging, and twitter, my colleagues and I are in the early adopter arena (back edge maybe, but still early adopters).  Need to reflect some on getting late adopters and laggards to the S1 stage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/comment-page-1/#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 07:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/#comment-70</guid>
		<description>When it comes to adoption and incorporation of new technologies, the barrier is getting to the starting line (or S1) in some cases.  In the DoD, organizational priorities, supporting requirements and fielded capabilities are purposely directed from the top down to ensure a unified approach across the enterprise.  One of the challenges in a hierarchical organization is seeding technology initiatives at the executive level, where position and status are often achieved through careful management of the status quo.  The easiest course of action is typically ‘going with what you know’ and sticking to the road well-travelled.  While the technology adoption and SL curve may resemble each other, the character of the organization will determine how parallel they are.

I’d argue that because of our risk-averse nature in both military procurement and operations, S1 doesn’t typically start until the ‘late majority’ or ‘laggard’ phase of tech adoption in the larger society.  Militarily, the US enjoys an asymmetric quantitative advantage compared to our world competitors.  The same could be said of the Soviet Union decades ago, but it eventually fell to a more nimble and qualitatively better foe.  We may find the tables turned on us some day in a similar scenario.  While this is a military example, it would apply to any organization with a risk-averse or change-resistant leadership.  To encourage agility, a learning organization has to be led from the top.  The CEOs, COOs, Generals and Admirals also need to be the “Chief Learners” to ensure technologies and their strategic, operational and tactical employment are allowed to incubate early and are adopted more quickly when their worth is established.  The challenge -- from line worker to middle manager -- is to support and encourage their seniors’ education.  The young deck seamen and mail room clerks of the world are the first to blog, Twitter, bookmark as well as buy the newest games and gadgets.  They should be encouraged to push the tools and ideas they gain from those personal acquisitions up the organization.  Don’t leave it to the CEO and serendipity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When it comes to adoption and incorporation of new technologies, the barrier is getting to the starting line (or S1) in some cases.  In the DoD, organizational priorities, supporting requirements and fielded capabilities are purposely directed from the top down to ensure a unified approach across the enterprise.  One of the challenges in a hierarchical organization is seeding technology initiatives at the executive level, where position and status are often achieved through careful management of the status quo.  The easiest course of action is typically ‘going with what you know’ and sticking to the road well-travelled.  While the technology adoption and SL curve may resemble each other, the character of the organization will determine how parallel they are.</p>
<p>I’d argue that because of our risk-averse nature in both military procurement and operations, S1 doesn’t typically start until the ‘late majority’ or ‘laggard’ phase of tech adoption in the larger society.  Militarily, the US enjoys an asymmetric quantitative advantage compared to our world competitors.  The same could be said of the Soviet Union decades ago, but it eventually fell to a more nimble and qualitatively better foe.  We may find the tables turned on us some day in a similar scenario.  While this is a military example, it would apply to any organization with a risk-averse or change-resistant leadership.  To encourage agility, a learning organization has to be led from the top.  The CEOs, COOs, Generals and Admirals also need to be the “Chief Learners” to ensure technologies and their strategic, operational and tactical employment are allowed to incubate early and are adopted more quickly when their worth is established.  The challenge &#8212; from line worker to middle manager &#8212; is to support and encourage their seniors’ education.  The young deck seamen and mail room clerks of the world are the first to blog, Twitter, bookmark as well as buy the newest games and gadgets.  They should be encouraged to push the tools and ideas they gain from those personal acquisitions up the organization.  Don’t leave it to the CEO and serendipity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adoption Rules, Issues, and News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Situational Adoption Curve</title>
		<link>http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Adoption Rules, Issues, and News &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Situational Adoption Curve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 03:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bwatwood.edublogs.org/2008/03/31/the-situational-adoption-curve/#comment-69</guid>
		<description>[...] Acceptance-with-Joy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAll three of us have gone through some interesting and remarkably similar phases in our adoption of social bookmarking, blogs, and lately - Twitter. In all three cases, we gained an initial understanding of the tool but pushed back and &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Acceptance-with-Joy wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptAll three of us have gone through some interesting and remarkably similar phases in our adoption of social bookmarking, blogs, and lately &#8211; Twitter. In all three cases, we gained an initial understanding of the tool but pushed back and &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
