I am always stoked when I get a chance to teach ILD 831 for Creighton University. This course in their Interdisciplinary Doctorate in Leadership Program has an eclectic group of leaders from around the world exploring the impact of technology in general and the internet in particular on leadership in organizations. Through this examination, these students struggle with how leadership does (or should) adapt to a changing world. In the past decade, the internet has certainly become a part of life and work. The internet has moved from a virtual space where people went to find information to an active place that is open, social and participatory. This shift has profound implications on leadership. How does a leader manage information (and knowledge) when the sum of all human knowledge is available to anyone in her or his organization from their smartphone? How is communication evolving? What are ethical issues associated with networked employees, students, or patients? What is on the horizon? This course gives students the opportunity to explore leadership mediated by a digital world.
My course map shows the flow of this 8-week course, which is starting this week:
This Spring class has teachers in K-12 and higher education, technologists, industry managers, a fire chief, and the CEO of a health system. I always love the mix of experiences these students bring to this examination. As we move through these eight weeks, they will all be blogging. You can see their posts – and interact with the class – at our Netvibes site.
These are interesting times to examine this intersection. I am currently reading Martin Ford’s 2015 book, The Rise of the Robots: Technology and the Threat of a Jobless Future. It paints a rather bleak picture around the idea that technology – and in particulary artificial intelligence – is creating a future where lots of jobs are eliminated but few jobs are created in their place. In other words, according to Ford, we face a future where unemployment and inequality will reach catastrophic levels. Scott Santens in an article in the Boston Globe last week mirrored similar thoughts.
Last week in Medium, danah boyd discussed “What is the Value of a Bot?” She noted that as systems get more complex, it becomes harder for developers to come together and develop “politeness policies” or guidelines for bots. She noted that it is getting increasingly difficult to discern between bots that are being helpful and bots that are a burden and not beneficial. One of the key points she made:
“Bots are first and foremost technical systems, but they are derived from social values and exert power into social systems. How can we create the right social norms to regulate them? What do the norms look like in a highly networked ecosystem where many pieces of the pie are often glued together by digital duct tape?”
This is the world these leaders are and will be leading in…and there are no easy answers. I am looking forward to our dialogue on the open web over the next two months!