There is supposedly an old Chinese curse that states, “May You Live in Interesting Times.” I would think that this last week – the first week of President Trump’s administration – qualifies as interesting times.
As someone who teaches about social media in both leadership and education classes, it was fascinating to watch unfolding events around social media in the federal government…which has lessons for those of us anywhere in leadership.
On Tuesday, the new administration attempted to control any communication with the public, ordering employees at multiple agencies to cease communicating with the public through news releases, official social media accounts and correspondence. This raised a firestorm of reaction, with the Department of Agriculture amending its policy:
“Yesterday, we sent an email message about Agency informational products like news releases and social media contact,” another email to employees said. “This internal email was released prior to receiving official Departmental guidance and is hereby rescinded.”
Not all agencies quietly complied. A series of tweets that went viral appeared to come from one of the National Park Services, quickly generating the hashtag #badasslands:
Officially, the Park Service reported that the tweets came from a former employee who still had access to their account. The Park pulled down the tweets…but by then, many copies were circulating (as I am doing here). A number of “rogue” Twitter accounts surfaced to continue pushing back against the perceived attack on science by this administration.
So one of the lessons is, in a digital age with multiple channels of communication – and the ability of anyone to communicate – “controlling” the message, whether from a federal department, a business, or an educational institution, is problematic.
Eighteen years ago, Jon Husband coined the term “wirearchy” – “a dynamic flow of power and authority, based on information, trust, credibility, and a focus on results, enabled by interconnected technology and people”.
Unlike a hierarchy, a wirearchy assumes openness and transparency. In a digitally connected world, information is going to flow…control is no longer possible. A 2014 Gartner report suggested:
“…Digital business is not just about expanding the use of technology. Digital business leaders must think about technology in a fundamentally different way than in the past…”
Westerman, Bonnett, and McAfee, in their 2014 book Leading Digital, noted that in the past, standardizing limited empowerment. Controlling impacted innovation. The desire to orchestrate action suggested “leashing” rather than unleashing employees. The wirearchial world in which we lead today requires the opposite – empowerment, innovation, and the unleashing of employees (or students).
My students in ILD 831 next week will be grappling with the implications of leadership in a hyperlinked world. I look forward to seeing their thoughts on our class Netvibes site.
{Graphic: Hugh McLeod}