In my Theory of eLearning class last night, the subject of working with clients came up. This class is for the Educational Technology track for a Masters in Education in Adult Learning. This program is designed for individuals who
“…want to gain in-depth knowledge and understanding of adult learning theory and practice, specifically in the fields of Human Resource Development and Adult Literacy, and through exploring technology in learning in today’s digital environment. Our graduates and current students work in business and industry, healthcare, government, non-profit, higher education, and community and human service agencies.”
So, a program that attracts a diverse group of students … and my class is no different. Last night, we explored emerging trends in technology for learning, using the 2014 NMC Horizon Report as a launch point. As one might suspect, this track attracts students who are comfortable with digital technology. During the class session, laptops, tablets, and smartphones were in constant use. One student texted a resource to another student with his phone as we discussed it…and no one batted an eye. So while we discussed the cost/benefit of staying with older technologies versus shifting to the new thing that is out … and facilitating those discussions with clients … their questions had less to do with their own ability to stay current and explore technologies as it did with working with clients who might not share their passion for digital technology.
Using Rogers’ Diffusion of Innovation, we discussed backwards translation of their early adoption terminology and practice to the early and late majority clients with whom they might be working. We also began to discuss general philosophies of instructional designer relationships with clients.
This brought back to my mind an earlier conversation I had with Enoch Hale. Enoch noted that he had a Philosophy of Teaching, and that he intended to work on a Philosophy of Faculty Development. It struck me as a great idea … and one I had never personally articulated.
My Philosophy of Teaching notes that teaching occurs in a distributed networked environment. Per my beliefs regarding teaching and learning, I see my role as:
- Promoting positive learning, modeling what I teach and learn;
- Sparking learner enthusiasm for learning and peer-teaching;
- And providing a strong foundation for lifelong reflective practice.
My role in faculty development is similar, but nuanced due to the collegial nature of the relationship one has (or should have) with fellow colleagues. In my role as faculty developer, I hope to both inspire and empower faculty. To do this, I like how Dakin Burdick framed his philosophy around three goals, and I will adopt them for my philosophical statement.
First, our work in faculty development is a means to an end, and that end should impact student learning. There is little empirical evidence that can directly correlate faculty development with improvements in student learning, and yet, that goal should be at the heart of what we do. My first priority is to effectively coach the fellow faculty with whom I work to experiment with new practice informed by what we know about how people learn, evolving theories of learning in distributed networks, and the selection of digital tools that lead to active and authentic learning. I also wish to partner with them to observe the impact and learn from it.
Second, what we do should enhance faculty satisfaction. For me, faculty development is all about the relationships I build with my colleagues. Jeffrey Nugent suggested a mindset with the term “Consultant for Life” that really resonated with me. Tom Peters noted once that in any organization, we are “all in sales” … but as faculty developers, I believe that we are all in the Human Capital business. In working with colleagues, I have my passions … but it is equally important to understand the passions of my colleagues … and look for ways to align the two. I need to see linkages between the digital affordances of the web and the learning goals of each discipline. By building relationships, I am also able to bring an interdisciplinary lens to these discussions. If I can help raise the faculty comfort level with digital processes, while keeping true to their disciplinary passions, I will facilitate faculty satisfaction … and perhaps spark some creative juices!
Third, our work should enhance the reputation of our institution. In a networked world, we have an amazing opportunity to share our celebrations and share our missteps … learning from each other. The web has evolved in the past decade to be one that is participatory – what danah boyd in It’s Complicated calls “networked publics.” Through blogs, through Twitter, through LinkedIn … name your social media … we have an obligation to share … and to build community with our faculty colleagues. My LinkedIn network map below shows five separate nodes … and I have an opportunity to add to our reputation by interacting across each of these nodes… and to enhance my institution’s reputation by learning from my network. It is a two-way street!
So, inspire, empower, impact student learning, enhance faculty satisfaction, and enhance institutional reputation. Am I off base? How would you add to or modify this for your role in faculty development? If you have published your philosophy, link to it in the comments. In this remix world of ours, I am looking for additional models from which to draw inspiration and learn.