In my ILD831 class for Creighton University this week, my 12 students will be looking at digital tools. Using Jane Hart’s C4LPT Top 200 list as a starting point, they self-selected the following tools to explore and analyze from a leadership perspective (number indicates rank on the Top 200 list):
- Audacity (28)
- Canva (57)
- Clarify (92)
- HaikuDeck (137)
- Lynda (37)
- Slack (20)
- SnagIt (26)
- TED Talks (21)
- Twitter (3)
- Udutu (61)
- WebEx (36)
- Yammer (12)
As part of their analyses, they will be factoring in insights as they start to read David Weinberger’s Too Big To Know, as well as thoughts on an interview with Clay Shirky on the disruptive power of collaboration. Their analyses will appear later this week in our Netvibes class page.
It is always interesting to consider the tools not selected by students as those selected. Jane this year has divided her Top Tools into three sub-lists – Personal Learning, Workplace Learning, and Education – and noted the following:
- “Individuals continue to reap the benefits of the opportunities offered to them on the Web to learn in all kinds of ways – both planned and unplanned, formal and informal, through content and people, online or on smart devices.
- Education is also making use of a wide range of multi-purpose web-based tools – probably because they are free and easy to use – alongside dedicated educational tools.
- Workplace learning, however, is still largely dominated by the use of traditional commercial tools for creating, delivering and managing e-learning. However, there is increasing use of new-style content development tools and greater use is being made of tools for social collaboration (and social learning) within work teams and groups.”
My class has business and non-profit executives, teachers and education administrators, military, corporate trainers, and healthcare managers. What I will find interesting is not what tools they chose or how they might use them, but “why?” they might make a choice. As an interdisciplinary group, I know we will learn from each other.
I found Jane Hart’s observations in each sub-group insightful. Professionals reported to her that they were using digital tools to search and research the web, learn from others, aggregate and curate resources, store and sync their various files, and increase their productivity, using a variety of smart devices. They reported a lot of experimentation on their own before they might bring a tool into the workplace or education.
In workplace learning, it was interesting and somewhat comforting that the number one tool was still Powerpoint. As my students know from watching my class videos, I lean towards Prezi myself, but Powerpoint has advantages, not the least being accessibility. Workplace tools included authoring tools, asset development tools (like infographics that I have played with), course management tools, and webinar tools. There is increasing use of time-line authoring tools, audience response tools, social tools, and web conferencing tools. I found it interesting that Jane noted the decreased use of FREE tools.
The opposite trend appeared in education, where free tools continue to be widely used along with commercial products. Tools that increased interactivity were particularly popular.
After 10 years of reporting the top tools, one thing that remains in my thinking is that tools come and go, but the processes seem to become more focused and defined. The specific tool is always less important than how and why it is being used. I look forward to hearing what my students have to say this week!